News & Updates
Direction for 2010
June 05, 2009 

All members are asked to put some thought into our approach for the Federal election in 2010 and NSW in March 2011 !


AGM is Aug 30 in Sydney
August 14, 2008 
All members welcome !

Rachael tackles Mayo
August 13, 2008 
Rachael Barons is standing for the Mayo by-election on September 6, 2008.  Your support warmly welcomed !

CFCE Election Results 2007
December 21, 2007 
Thanks everybody for a teriffic effort ! !
Results here as at today.

Walk Against Warming 2007
November 12, 2007 

Carbon Tax Survey
October 28, 2007 
Click here to help us get the input we need !

CFCE Now Registered for The Election
October 14, 2007 
At the end of last week the Australian Electoral Commission confirmed our registration in time for the 2007 election.  Our party name will now appear on ballot papers alongside the candidate, and we can endorse Senate groups.

YouTube 5 point reality check
August 16, 2007 



Australian emissions 36 times sustainable level.
July 24, 2007 
According to the 2005 National Greenhouse Inventory, released earlier this year, Australia's annual emissions are 27.6 tonnes CO2e per capita.

Tasmanian Forest Woes
July 23, 2007 
Today the Labor party backed the existing forest agreements in Tasmania, backing away from last election's commitment to the protection of old growth forests.

The Media Campaign Commences !
June 29, 2007 
Internet, Advertising, Radio, News

Survey reveals strong support for a conservative climate / environment party.
June 23, 2007 

An online survey reveals that 76% would consider voting for a conservative climate / environment party.


CSIRO points to a 2 degree target.
June 20, 2007 

... and large scale emissions reductions.



Archive
 
We must take immediate businesslike action to limit climate change to
2 degrees C, not for ourselves, but for future generations.
           - Richard McNeall
Climate Facts
 
     
 
         
         
CO2 14,472m3 @ 1.85kg/m3 (19OC) = 26.8T (Calculation R.McNeall)  
 
1) What is the science of Climate Change ?
 
  Fortunately in 1988, the international community established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - IPCC www.ipcc.ch to do regular expert peer-reviewed and government-reviewed assesments of the state of Climate Change.  These come out about every 5 years, with the much-publicised Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) coming out in 4 stages throughout 2007.
 
 
Some conclusions quoted from this 2007 assessment are:

 

  • Very high confidence that the global average net effect of human activities since 1750 has been one of warming.

 

  • Changes in arctic temperatures and ice, widespread changes in precipitation amounts, ocean salinity, wind patterns and aspects of extreme weather including droughts, heavy precipitation, heat waves and the intensity of tropical cyclones.

 

  • Significant loss of biodiversity is projected to occur by 2020 in some ecologically-rich sites including the Great Barrier Reef and Queensland Wet Tropics. Other sites at risk include Kakadu wetlands, southwest Australia, sub-Antarctic islands and the alpine areas.

 

  • Production from agriculture and forestry by 2030 is projected to decline over much of southern and eastern Australia.

 

2) Why a 2 degree target ?
 
The  Stern Review  www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/4/3/Executive_Summary.pdf comissioned by the UK Government has taken this into the economic arena.  Figure 2 of this document (reproduced below) shows the consequences of even small temperature increases.  As can the chart shows - if we let global warming slide to 3 degrees we risk  severe water shortages, food shortages, rainforest collapse, extinctions, and large scale irreversible effects.  At 4 or 5 degrees we face the worst effects including major sea level rise and Gulf Stream collapse.  This is consistent with the European Commission's 2 degree target http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2007/com2007_0002en01.pdf , and the 2 degree basis of the CSIRO's submission to the Emissions Trading Task Group  www.pmc.gov.au/climate_change/emissions/task_group/submissions/142_sub_emissionstrading.pdf .
 
 
Source: Stern Review - reproduced under the terms of the Click-Use Licence.
 
 
Some of Stern's quoted conclusions are:

 

  • Our actions over the coming few decades could create risks of major disruption to economic and social activity, later in this century and in the next, on a scale similar to those associated with the great wars and the economic depression of the first half of the 20th century. And it will be difficult or impossible to reverse these changes.

 

  • Rich countries taking responsibility for emissions reductions of 60-80% from 1990 levels by 2050.  Again this is consistent with the 60-80% of the European Commission.  For Australia, the CSIRO submission points to 60-90%, presumably on the basis of our poor starting point below.  

 

  • Stabilisation of greenhouse gases at levels of 500-550ppm CO2e will cost, on average, around 1% of annual global GDP by 2050. This is significant, but is fully consistent with continued growth and development, in contrast with unabated climate change, which will eventually pose significant threats to growth.

 

3) How is Australia going ?
 
Australia is not going very well.  We are the worst emitter at 26.8 tonnes per person (2004) including land use and forestry.  Here is the list for Kyoto countries ...  

Country

 

Emissions per person
per year
(tonnes CO2e)

 

Australia

26.8

 

Canada

 

25.8

 

United States

 

21.5

 

Ireland

 

17.2

 

Iceland

 

16.9

 

Belgium

 

14.2

 

Netherlands

 

13.5

 

Russia

 

12.7

 

New Zealand

 

12.7

 

Denmark

 

12.4

 

Greece

 

12.4

 

Finland

 

12.1

 

Germany

 

11.9

 

United Kingdom

 

11.0

 

Japan

 

9.9

 

Spain

 

9.9

 

Austria

 

9.1

 

France

 

8.5

 

Italy

 

8.2

 

Hungary

 

7.8

 

Portugal

 

7.8

 

Norway

 

6.3

 

Sweden

 

5.9

 

Romania

 

5.4

 

These figures are taken from actual 2004 UNFCCC returns http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2006/sbi/eng/26.pdf divided by 2004 population  www.census.gov/ipc/www/idb .  

And our emissions are growing faster than most other developed countries !  As a special exception, our Kyoto target is for an 8% increase on 1990, which we might just make.  But there is a catch.  Kyoto's base year of 1990 was our peak land-clearing year which gave us a head-start.  Looking at the UNFCCC return (excluding land use & forestry), our underlying emissions have increased by 25.1% since 1990, one of the worst results in a period when many industrialised countries are starting to make real reductions.
      
    
4) How can we help as individuals ?
 
                    
                    
A good place to start is the Cool It site of Australian Greenhouse Office www.greenhouse.gov.au/gwci/index.html which gives practical advice on how to minimise our personal emissions .
     
Also consider joining Conservatives for Climate and Environment (free) to get some real  climate change momentum going in Australia !